<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="abstract" dtd-version="1.0" xml:lang="en" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">CC</journal-id>
<journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">Cardiol Croat</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Cardiologia Croatica</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="pubmed">Cardiol. Croat.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">1848-543X</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1848-5448</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Croatian Cardiac Society</publisher-name></publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">CC_11(10-11)_430</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15836/ccar2016.430</article-id>
<article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Extended Abstract</subject></subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Management of atrial fibrillation in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2623-1475</contrib-id><name><surname>Petra&#x010D;</surname><given-names>Dubravko</given-names></name></contrib>
<aff id="aff1">&#x00AB;Bogdan&#x00BB; Outpatient Cardiology Clinic, Zagreb, <country>Croatia</country></aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1">Address for correspondence: Dubravko Petra&#x010D;, Kardiolo&#x0161;ka poliklinika Bogdan, Bu&#x017E;anova 4, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia. / Phone: +385-1-4823-782 / E-mail: <email xlink:href="d.petrac@inet.hr">d.petrac@inet.hr</email></corresp></author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub-ppub"><month>11</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
<volume>11</volume>
<issue>10-11</issue>
<fpage>430</fpage>
<lpage>430</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>25</day><month>09</month><year>2016</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>10</day><month>10</month><year>2016</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-year>2016</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Croatian Cardiac Society</copyright-holder>
</permissions>
<kwd-group kwd-group-type="author"><title>Keywords: </title><kwd>atrial fibrillation</kwd><kwd>cardiac resynchronization therapy</kwd><kwd>heart failure</kwd><kwd>management</kwd></kwd-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<p>With regard to clinical profile, atrial fibrillation (AF) is often present in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy and can have a significant negative impact on the prognosis and clinical response to CRT. Management of AF in patients with CRT is multilevel and includes optimal medical heart failure (HF) therapy, anticoagulant therapy, and rate or rhythm control strategy. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r1"><italic>1</italic></xref>-<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="r3"><italic>3</italic></xref>)</p>
<p>In patients with HF and AF, rhythm control with antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) has failed to show any survival benefit compared with a rate control strategy. In this context, a rate control with drugs (beta-blockers or/and digoxin) was preferred as first-line therapy in CRT patients with persistent/permanent AF. However, the most observational CRT studies and meta-analyses indicate that AV junction ablation (AVJA) is superior to rate control drugs in achieving adequate biventricular pacing (BVP) and reducing mortality. Amiodarone and dofetilide are the lone guideline-recommended AADs for rhythm control in HF patients, but they have a moderate efficacy and significant side effects, including proarrhythmia. Because of that the use of AF catheter ablation (AFCA) for a rhythm control is extended to patients with chronic HF. In recent meta-analysis of 16 observational studies with 1253 patients, overall success rate of AFCA in patients with LV dysfunction was 77% with consequent improvement in EF of 13%. Four small randomized studies that compared AFCA with a rate control in HF patients with persistent AF showed a significant improvement in EF, quality of life and functional capacity with AFCA. In randomized study that included 203 pts with persistent AF, HF, EF&lt;40% and implanted ICD/CRT-D, AFCA was superior to amiodarone in achieving freedom from AF (70 versus 34%, p&lt;0.001) and reducing hospitalization (31 versus 38%, p&lt;0.001) and mortality ((8 versus 18%, p=0.037).</p>
<p>The critical goal of AF management in CRT patients is to ensure a high percentage of BiVP (&gt;98%). In this context, rate control strategy remains the first therapeutic option for CRT pts with permanent AF. AFCA should be considered in CRT patients with paroxysmal AF who are non-responders to AADs, and in selected patients with persistent AF prior to accepting a rate control strategy.</p>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>Literature</title>
<ref id="r1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Anselmino</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Matta</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Castagno</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><name><surname>Giustetto</surname><given-names>C</given-names></name><name><surname>Gaita</surname><given-names>F</given-names></name></person-group>. <article-title>Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in chronic heart failure: state-of-the-art and future perspectives.</article-title> <source>Europace</source>. <year>2016</year> May;<volume>18</volume>(<issue>5</issue>):<fpage>638</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/europace/euv368</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26857188</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Al Halabi</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Qintar</surname><given-names>M</given-names></name><name><surname>Hussein</surname><given-names>A</given-names></name><name><surname>Alraies</surname><given-names>MCh</given-names></name><name><surname>Jones</surname><given-names>DG</given-names></name><name><surname>Wong</surname><given-names>T</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.</article-title> <source>J JACC Clin Electrophysiol.</source> <year>2015</year>;<volume>1</volume>(<issue>3</issue>):<fpage>200</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>9</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.jacep.2015.02.018</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">26258174</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="r3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><name><surname>Di Biase</surname><given-names>L</given-names></name><name><surname>Mohanty</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Mohanty</surname><given-names>S</given-names></name><name><surname>Santangeli</surname><given-names>P</given-names></name><name><surname>Trivedi</surname><given-names>Ch</given-names></name><name><surname>Lakkireddy</surname><given-names>D</given-names></name><etal/></person-group> <article-title>Ablation Versus Amiodarone for Treatment of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Congestive Heart Failure and an Implanted Device: Results From the AATAC Multicenter Randomized Trial.</article-title> <source>Circulation</source>. <year>2016</year>;<volume>133</volume>:<fpage>1637</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>44</lpage>. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.019406</pub-id><pub-id pub-id-type="pmid">27029350</pub-id></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>
